Editorial policy

Our goal is practical, original tutorials that explain real code. Articles should describe the exact shipped selectors, variables, and event handlers. We do not publish claims about search volume, rankings, customer ratings, or advertising approval without evidence.

Source and demo consistency

The live demo, code tabs, standalone download, and source bundle come from the same local snippet files. Changes to those files require a new build. Articles must have descriptive links to relevant guides and three distinct recommendations below the written tutorial.

Testing boundaries

Repository checks validate metadata, downloads, internal links, and source syntax. Browser checks cover the site and the authored demos when the browser tooling is available. Passing these checks does not mean a snippet was tested in a real WordPress installation, in every browser, or with every plugin. Real WordPress integration testing is recorded separately in the build progress log.

Corrections and dates

Dates indicate editorial publication or substantive edits, rather than automatically changing on every build. A reported issue should be reproduced where possible, corrected in both code and prose, and documented. Unfinished catalog entries stay outside published routes and the sitemap.

Independence

The site currently has no analytics or advertising scripts. Future advertisements must be distinct from copy controls and downloads. We do not promise Google rankings or AdSense approval. See contact and corrections for the configured reporting channel.